Home| Letters| Links| RSS| About Us| Contact Us

On the Frontline

What's New

Table of Contents

Index of Authors

Index of Titles

Index of Letters

Mailing List


subscribe to our mailing list:



SECTIONS

Critique of Intelligent Design

Evolution vs. Creationism

The Art of ID Stuntmen

Faith vs Reason

Anthropic Principle

Autopsy of the Bible code

Science and Religion

Historical Notes

Counter-Apologetics

Serious Notions with a Smile

Miscellaneous

Letter Serial Correlation

Mark Perakh's Web Site

Letters

[Write a Reply] [Letters Index]

Title Author Date
Does not the creationist's argument refute itself? Frank, Mark Jan 07, 2009
David

My concern was only with that one specific error.

I guess the creationist is trying to point out a problem with a naturalist model of the universe. So considerations of what an omnipotent deity can achieve are not essential to the (invalid) argument. We all know that once the big G is invoked can be done.
Related Articles: The Fine-Tuned Universe -- the insignificance of very small numbers