subscribe to our mailing list:
|
SECTIONS
|
|
|
|
Letters
[Write a Reply]
[Letters Index]
Title |
Author |
Date |
Your review of Barr |
Frank, Mark |
May 30, 2007
|
Thank you for this interesting and perceptive review. There is a related question I would really like to see you write about as it requires a deep understanding of physics to be convincing.
"What does materialism mean?" or perhaps more accurately "How can we interpret statements that deny materialism?"
I find the distinction between materialism and non-materialism quite unclear. Science continues to deduce the existence of more and more phenomena that are fundamentally unobservable and have properties that are increasingly peculiar to the layman - from electromagnetic radiation through quarks and singularities. Yet all of these phenomena would be accepted by the most hardline atheist/materialist. (I suspect that cosmology even deals with concepts that are outside time and space - but my expertise is not up to that.) Where are the boundaries of the material which the non-material is outside?
Suppose we find a clear message written in the stars saying "I am your God and to prove it I will make all the stars vanish for 24 hours" this then happens. Does this prove the existence of non-materialism? Or does it just drastically expand the scope of science?
Anyhow I am sure you could write about this very well and I, for one, would find it fascinating.
Mark Frank
|
Related Articles: |
Non Sequitur in five parts
|
|
|